1-Minute Update - What do you want to see?

Search Forums:


rated by 0 users
This post has 13 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 231
Points 4,310
Steph_a_writer Posted: 16 Jan 2009 1:43 PM

We're taking Obama's catch word, CHANGE, and putting it into practice. Get ready for a new 1-Minute Update email newsletter.

The newsletter goes out to all members every other week and we want it to be something that is useful, informative, and most of all entertaining.

Here's your chance to tell us what you want to see in the 1-Minute Update, what you don't want to see, and your overall comments on the newsletter. Vote in the poll and leave comments.

(If you choose other, please press reply and tell us specifically what you want to see)

What do you want to see in the 1-Minute Update? (LOG IN TO VOTE)

  • Answers to common OT questions (26.3%)
  • Product reviews (0%)
  • Profiles of members, staff, OTs, and others (15.8%)
  • Quizzes, polls, and other interactive content (0%)
  • Tips from experts on a variety of issues (36.8%)
  • Other (click reply on the top of this post and write what you want to see) (21.1%)
  • Total Votes: 19
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 222
Points 2,200

Not sure this site is working?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 113
Points 1,260

What problem are you experiencing?

Sam Gonzales
AOTA - Social Media Manager
sgonzales@aota.org  

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 222
Points 2,200

Cannot click on the survey if I use the link in the e-mail even though I can see the questions...it actually looks like a summary of responses...
 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 113
Points 1,260

Debbie, 

you have to be logged in to the site be able to vote. 

Sam Gonzales
AOTA - Social Media Manager
sgonzales@aota.org  

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 222
Points 2,200

Thank-you...

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 71
Points 895

Was unable to enter a comment to explain why I checked "other" and since that is the most popular response so far I think you need to fix this. Gial

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 12
Points 150

I would like to know if Lucy Jane Miller succeeded in presenting and having Sensory Processing Disorder accepted by  DSM-5 committee as a new diagnosis. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 2
Points 55

Is there perhaps a chance to make this more user friendly?  First, white text on gray is hard to see on many monitors, second there is only one choice when voting and none are really what I want to see (I would like trends, policy, information that helps us keep abreast of the national issues beyond our profession as well as within it), it is not clear how to access the "voting", the page lacks useful directions, and when logging in (which is NOT a transparent process), one is flipped to the mega-crammed site which is OT connections, and then trying to find the right blog among zilliions, trying the search box to re-find "one-minute update" or similar produces nothing. Thank goodness for the Jetson's-style icon you have selected--that at least suggested I might be on the right page.   Hey, is this site Bobby-approved?  : )

Chris Knippenberg

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 231
Points 4,310

Hi Chris!

I'll forward this to our IT department and see what we can do about making the polls more user friendly.

In the mean time, I hope to open a little discussion here in the comments section about what everyone wants out of their bi-weekly e-newsletter.

I appreciate your comments and ideas!

-Stephanie

 

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Female
Posts 53
Points 625

No, that question has not been answered by the DSM-5 committee.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 12
Points 150
I found even more information at the SPD website.  They on in the process of doing a number of studies that were requested by the DSM-5 committee.  They need to complete these in about a year.  If it becomes a diagnosis who will be making the determination since it is usually done by physicians and yet they will not have the SIPT training?  Velma

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Female
Posts 53
Points 625

Of course that is an important issue.  Would it be limited to psychologists and psychiatrists?  What do you think?

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 12
Points 150
I think it would more appropriate for pediatricians and neurologists although the DSM is for psychiatric disorders.  I doubt that there will be insurance coverage which is crucial if it is only diagnosed by psychologists and psychiatrists.  At the moment I don't think that psychologists feel that there has been enough research to prove that SPD is real and treatable.  I was just at a course where a research psychologist from Yale said essentially that SPD is interesting but there isn't enough research.  I suspect that SPD is perceived this way by many professions other than OT.  What do you think.  Velma


From: general [mailto:general@aota.org] On Behalf Of Christina
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:28 PM
To: ottervgc@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [general] RE: 1-Minute Update - What do you want to see?

Of course that is an important issue.  Would it be limited to psychologists and psychiatrists?  What do you think?

From: vgconway <bounce-vgconway@aota.org>
Sent: 2/10/2009 7:26:28 PM

I found even more information at the SPD website.  They on in the process of doing a number of studies that were requested by the DSM-5 committee.  They need to complete these in about a year.  If it becomes a diagnosis who will be making the determination since it is usually done by physicians and yet they will not have the SIPT training?  Velma

 




  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS