OT's not doing ADL's

Search Forums:


This post has 115 Replies | 35 Followers

replied on 15 Jun 2011 12:59 AM
wow! I am totally flabbergasted. I had no idea. I am really disapointed to hear that. It seems really rare to be able to deliver true high quality, evidence based, client centered, occupation based,  customer service oriented, value based OT these days. I don't know why that is.  I find myself having to defend excellence by people interested in the "status quo" or "productivity" or people who do chart reviews and do not have more than a basic idea of what they think OT "should" be doing based on what they "think" OT is. I guess all we can do is keep striving for excellence and explaining to others what the Centennial Vision is and what true OT can do to improve the lives of people beyond doing rote exercises or moving pegs around and calling that OT. I guess I don't understand management. People are not widgets.

Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ekabuga <bounce-ekabuga@aota.org> wrote:
  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5

Yes, I see this as a huge problem, several of the COTA's I work w/ spend large amounts of time doing UE exercise on people w/ normal ROM and strength of the UE's.  I constantly ask them what functional activity are they working toward, is the pt's strength insufficient for an activity they need or want to do.  Having been a manager for many years, I have been aware it is up to me to keep close contact w/ the therapist's constantly asking them to think about whether their tx program is moving directly toward increasing a pt's function, if it isn't, then the tx needs to be reconsidered.  I think there is a robot mentality among many therapists to do rote exercises to pass the tx time, still feel that the heart of OT is function - on the pt's terms. Currently our OT schedules in the morning are almost completely devoted to ADL's - but it takes ongoing input of the OT's to coordinate closely with the COTA's to make sure this happens.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 9
Points 135
I am fortunate to work in Acute Rehab and have "enough" time to spend with my patients as I work on BADLs at least everyother day and "exercises/balance/Therex/Theract".  I do see benefit in working on strength and giving home exercise programs for strenth in the elderly population even if they are strong enough to do BADLS because one week of bedrest (pneumonia) will take the 3+ strength person and lead them to being dependent in ADLs where if they have some strength to loose, they will bounce back better.  In my "strong" patients it is not a big focus of treatment but I do address it as a teaspoon of prevention.  I try to find exercises the patients see meaningful and like (chair tricep dips and counter top push-ups are usually a big hit).  I would not do strengthening with a person rather than work on the needed BADL, but I do find it as a nice rounding of treatment, a good time to provide education and many of the patients like to do exercises together while they gossip re: the people they know in common (I work in a small town - glad I wasn't raised here or they'd be gossiping about me:).
----------
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Female
Posts 2
Points 25

 I am an early bird every day at my work place, and I spend most of my morning in my pts room working on  ADLs and  IADLs. Pts get board every time they go to the gym doing the same thing ( dowel, therabands, restorator bike). So I prefer to get them to do IADLs  overhead reaching, trunk extension, reaching  in closet shelves, organizing and dusting  pictures on the wall,  and at the same time Im working on dynamic or static standing balance, postural stability, eduaction for fall prevention, energy conservation. So many things you can do what is meaninful fot the pt. I seeing many OTs and COTAs not creativity at all and all they do is puzzles, is very sad to hear and said that but is the truth.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 50
Points 430

I worked in a facility that required most treatments to be in the gym for OT and PT.  There was an issue with verifying that patients were seen.  Some patients would say they didn't get therapy because they did not consider dressing and grooming therapy.  

We also had a very high pressure productivity requirement where at the time the expectation was to see 3-4 part A patients at the same time, back to back throughout the day.  It was impossible to do ADLS (one on one) and consistently meet productivity requirements at the time.  

The other issue was that my facility was very PT centered and they had PT techs (they called them rehab techs but they only followed PT orders).  There were 4-5 PT clinicians to our 2 OTs.  In the morning the PT staff would grab all of the patients which meant 4 for every PT/PTA and take them to the gym.  That meant by the time OT finished an ADL session in the morning with one or two patients, we had no one else we could treat until PT finished there treatments.

 That translated into PTs finishing their treatments around noon or 1 while OT was still treating until 5 or 6.  I recognize changes have been made and I think that my facility was the extreme and not the norm, but I vowed I would never do SNF again.  It was like do factory work just to manage the volume of patients seen in a day.  I hope it is better quality care these days.  But from my experience that was the least functional environment to work in.  In addition, I never wanted to do full showers with people because the bathing areas were unsanitary and would not subject a patient to something I am not willing to do.

  • | Post Points: 20
replied on 26 Apr 2012 9:23 PM

Wow., I am really sorry. We recently got "push back" from the PT dept when we lost the budget for a transporter. and went to the "RN model losing all our LPN< CNA.< support staff  - its hard- but I think we found a compromise

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 5
Points 40

Meredith,

 

Please would you give me more information about this new orthopedic procedure?  I work in a SNF and I am so grieved at the seeing the numbers of elderly people with misery and pain after hip surgery,  and  who are  trying to adhere to those THP for so long. The people with dementia have it even worse since they cannot remember to be careful.

 

I'd love to know  about this, even though your post if from 2 years ago!! Perhaps I can help spread the word here in GA...

 

Thanks, 

Nancy Fowler, OTR/L

  • | Post Points: 20

Nancy, I wonder if you could google "Biomet magnum hip" and then find a nice surgeon in your area and just speak to him about your worries and how difficult it is for the elderly to adhere to the precautions and maybe ask him to give an inservice on how much "wiggle room" he allows in the precautions? After working with the surgeons on a daily basis for the two years we supported them in changing their surgery protocols and developing a new program I found them to be very compassionate and wanted to ease the burden on their patients in any way they could. I must tell you though, It took a year and a half for these surgeons, who all worked for the same office, under the same medical director, developing the same program to get even THEM to agree on the protocols and precautions. It was insane for a while. If you have surgeon "A" your precautions are "B" and you can only exit the bed from the "C" side, if you have surgeon "B" your precautions are "E" and you can exit the bed from  "F" side, if you have surgeon "C" you don't have any precautions and can exit the bed any side you want to. I would just approach the surgeon in a humble manner and find one that is willing to speak to your concerns in a caring manner.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 5
Points 40
Meredith, 

Thank you so very much for your reply!  I will do the search and pass the info among my colleagues here. I agree with your approach, and would hope only to communicate with the surgeons. Generally they have shown that they care very much about their patients. I know that things can move quite slowly, after all I work in academia too.  But we gotta start somewhere. I'm just overjoyed and thanking God that there is progress in the direction of  simpler recovery after such an advanced surgery!

However, I've seen my share of joints popping out and patient returned to surgery....and of course what I don't know is whether this can be attributed to them  having not followed THP, or perhaps the patient inherently "loose-jointed", or maybe (well, it's possible) that the surgeon did a poor job. We do have those as well. 

Thank you for the name of the surgery, and for your careful, thoughtful, and professional posting. 
Sincerely, 

 

Nancy L. Fowler, MS, OTR/L

Admissions Counselor

College of Health & Science

School of Occupational Therapy

Brenau University

Office: 678-707-5001   Fax: 678-707-5015

nfowler1@brenau.edu




  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 1
Points 5

 

I too am an OTR and a rehab manager. I agree with your observations and am too concerned with this trend among our colleagues. Moreover, my deepest concern is the one dimensional aspect in which we allow ourselves to be defined. It is in our deepest roots as human beings to remain productive not stagnant this becomes even more important when dealing with the geriatric population. Why are we not advocating for more than the basic dressing, toileting, bathing, feeding and mobility issues? These are the basic necessities needed to be productive. What about the occupations that are important to the individual? For instance, Jane Doe wants to return to being a great wife and an active grandmother. Those are her occupations; they go beyond the boundaries of ADL activities. Why are we just focusing on ADL's? Why are occupational therapists not working on OCCUPATION!!!???? And why to so many does this seem like such a foreign concept? Just bc Jane Doe can feed or dress herself does NOT equal success in her goal to be a good wife and or grandmother. In conclusion, our end goals should be more complex, more meaningful not just the basic necessities for we are complex individuals and this is why our training is so unique so diverse in educational background. We alone are the practionioners who are not only able but it is our duty to give freedom, passion, drive and ambition back to the ever-aging elderly population.

Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 230
Points 2,210
Well said Aundrea~
 
In a message dated 5/8/2012 2:42:36 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, bounce-AundreaBootsma@aota.org writes:

 

I too am an OTR and a rehab manager. I agree with your observations and am too concerned with this trend among our colleagues. Moreover, my deepest concern is the one dimensional aspect in which we allow ourselves to be defined. It is in our deepest roots as human beings to remain productive not stagnant this becomes even more important when dealing with the geriatric population. Why are we not advocating for more than the basic dressing, toileting, bathing, feeding and mobility issues? These are the basic necessities needed to be productive. What about the occupations that are important to the individual? For instance, Jane Doe wants to return to being a great wife and an active grandmother. Those are her occupations; they go beyond the boundaries of ADL activities. Why are we just focusing on ADL's? Why are occupational therapists not working on OCCUPATION!!!???? And why to so many does this seem like such a foreign concept? Just bc Jane Doe can feed or dress herself does NOT equal success in her goal to be a good wife and or grandmother. In conclusion, our end goals should be more complex, more meaningful not just the basic necessities for we are complex individuals and this is why our training is so unique so diverse in educational background. We alone are the practionioners who are not only able but it is our duty to give freedom, passion, drive and ambition back to the ever-aging elderly population.

From: Karla <bounce-karlajo@aota.org>
Sent: 10/26/2009 11:51:38 PM

I'm a rehab manager at a SNF and also an OT though I rarely practice now due to management responsibilities.  My OT team seems to have drifted from the roots of what I feel is OT.  I rarely see them in early to do morning basic ADL's with the clients (or reverse ADL's in the evenings).  I see them in the gym doing FM/GM coordination activities/ Cog. Skills/ Exercises/ and practicing putting clothes over clothes.  I have heard clients complain about playing with pegs, painting, etc.  Has anyone else had this experience?  As an OT it blows my mind that you wouldn't do ADL retraining when the person actually needs to do their ADL's for best buy in and for most meaningful treatment session and carryover.  If you have had this experience either as an OT or as a supervisor - please share with me how you handled the situation.  Do you require your staff to be in at a certain time in the morning?  I understand that ADL retraining can be completed at all times of the day but with the geriatric population you would be extremely lucky to have them get dressed once let alone getting dressed and undressed in the middle of the day (unless it's shower day - then yippee!).   And I do know that what I'm seeing in the gym are in general components needed to do some ADL but I'm seeing the actual dressing skills maybe being addressed once a week if I'm lucky.  By the way the CPT codes being billed reflect that ADL's are not being completed at a level that you would expect.  Thanks for any input.




  • | Post Points: 5
Page 8 of 8 (116 items) « First ... < Previous 4 5 6 7 8 | RSS