Membership and OT Issues

Search Forums:


This post has 36 Replies | 16 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Female
Posts 102
Points 1,020
Our state RA representative was at a recent district OT meeting.  She encouraged all OTs to join AOTA because those of us who are members are achieving benefits for all OTs and carrying the rest of them along w/ us.  There are individual issues in each state that AOTA provides support for.  Also AOTA needs working therapists because many of the higher level AOTA positions are filled by academic OTs, university professors.  Often they have more time to devote to AOTA issues and more flexible schedules, but staff therapist's input is crucial.  AOTA needs to understand the issues that all of us face and we need a way to communicate w/ each other.  This new OT Connections is great.


Joanne

--- On Sat, 3/21/09, Holly Hendryx <bounce-hhendryx@aota.org> wrote:
From: Holly Hendryx <bounce-hhendryx@aota.org>
Subject: Re: [general] Membership and OT Issues
To: jbossemelgosa@sbcglobal.net
Date: Saturday, March 21, 2009, 5:10 PM

I appreciate the information shared in this thread ... I am new graduate with 7 months experience with my first employer. Knowing a number of my fellow coworkers are not members of AOTA, I approached my supervisor and asked if I could do an informal presentation on the benefits of AOTA as there are a lot of new & exciting things happening. The response I received was that I could do the presentation, but my supervisor would not attend because she's not interested in being a member of AOTA. (She also shared the Rehab Director who is an OT is not a member either.)
I was surprised at her response, but recovered and introduced another idea of having a table set up in the cafeteria to reach a broader audience.
I would still like to subtlety educate my fellow OTs -- any one with thoughts or ideas from their own workplace experiences?  
 

From: Joanne <bounce-melgosa@aota.org>
Sent: 3/13/2009 10:42:26 PM

I totally agree.  I remember treating a Parkinson's pt in a SNF several years ago.  I helped her use a walker to get into the bathroom to brush her teeth... no problem.  Then she could not turn around to get out.  We must have taken another 30 minutes or so to turn around and get back to her bed.  Later that day I asked her PT if she could work on turning around, as she had given glowing reports about how far this patient could walk down the hall.  The PT laughed at me.  The poor patient could walk all day in a straight line, but had no functional mobility whatsoever.
You have encountered the same problem I've seen.  We have to make sure our ability to teach patients how to do functional tasks is maintained.



Joanne

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Female
Posts 11
Points 160

Hello all - I just found the Member-to-Member (M2M) Toolkit at AOTA's website. The link is http://www.aota.org/Benefits/M2M.aspx.  This is a great resource for reaching out to my fellow professionals! I just wanted to share for those who are interested in this topic.

Sal - I don't believe we've met before! Thanks for your post.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Female
Posts 2
Points 10

I also agree. I am a student currently and I assumed it was mandated by AOTA to become a member because all of the students must subscribe for classes. I know I didn't use it when I first became a member but now I use the resources all the time for all of my classes and research I am interested in. I will continue to be an active member. This is also a topic we recently discussed in one of my classes and we were all surprised to see the low percentage of practicing therapists who are actually members. I also would like to see OTs from all over the U.S. become members if they aren't already. I don't think that many of the non-members realize or have any idea about the benefits and resources he or she have available.

 

Shelby

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 203
Points 2,120
Without AOTA listserve, I'm not sure I would have survived my first few jobs!  I read all the listserves and just when I said "that isn't important to me"  Voila - I had a child with a similar issue. 
Taking pride in our professional organization and realizing how little our profession is recognized (compared to PT's, RN's etc).  This makes it more important than ever to have our organization focused on those issues that affect us since we don't have time and energy to go to the State House or Washington to fight.  I graduated just as the BBA (Balanced Budget Act) was enacted.  Job offers dropped like a rock.    AOTA fought [and continues to fight]  to keep OT services when laws are enacted, when Medicare is changed, and when insurance companies refuse to pay for (fill in the blank).  Our services are life-changing to our clients.  AOTA is life-changing for us by keeping us in the clinics and communities.
Attending my first AOTA conference last year was an eye-opener - too many options to get it all in.  Exhilarating and overwhelming at the same time!

Shelby, Thank you for your comments.  There are OT's around the world who want to join AOTA!  So why not the OT's in the US also??
Warm regards,
Linda

 

 

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Female
Posts 17
Points 200

Hello Forum!!

MY VOTE: make AOTA membership Mandatory like ASHA and SLP's. Mandatory dues will instantly increase our budget and Money, like it or not, will solve many of the problems with our professions visibility, lobby needs, research, and activity. No OT can say they do not make enough money to contribute to the vitality of their own profession. With this money we could employ OTs or even committees to do public activities necessary to build our profession. It is our own fault that the general public doesnt know what we do. Maybe if OTs were forced to pay dues they would be inclined to be more involved...It's the principal TimeShares were based off of. TOTA in Dallas is currently rebuilding our local organization and we parallel the statistics quoted in the

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 203
Points 2,120
Could we put this to a referendum vote - do we need a referendum vote - to make AOTA and local membership mandatory? I'm sure there would be a hue and cry but I think it's time.  We've been nice forever - now let's be realistic too.
Linda

Not Ranked
Female
Posts 1
Points 5

Great post, OTDallas! You wrote everything I was (and have been) thinking, and I could not have worded this any better.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 5
Points 55

Anti-trust laws prevent AOTA - and as far as I am aware, all health care organizations - from requiring that graduates of educational programs become members of the associations. Membership was originally required of those who became certified by the American Occupational Therapy Certification Board (AOTCB, the forerunner of NBCOT). But since the certification board separated from the association and became an independent entity, membership has been voluntary. There is no way AOTA could enforce required membership. It has no power over right to practice. That power belongs to NBCOT and the state licensure boards.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 203
Points 2,120
Unless I'm mistanken - APTA requires membership.  If you compare figures (look at OT Connection) you will notice the great difference in APTA membership and available funds for promoting PT.  AOTA looks pitiful compared to APTA!  If a majority (all) OT's were members, think of what a difference it would make to our profession.
Perhaps the issue is the separation of AOTA and NBCOT, preventing such a requirement? There were reasons at the time that never came to pass.
Linda

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 921
Points 14,135

APTA membership is NOT a requirement to practice PT in any state that I know of.

Ron Carson MHS, OT

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Female
Posts 203
Points 2,120
I had to go back and look at older posts -- Let me correct and re-phrase  - Being a member of your state organization is mandatory in the APTA membership.  However, a higher # of PT join their professional organization as compared to OT (41% PT / 36% OT) That 5% translates into over 8000 members for PT and 5000 members for OT ) - and there are more PT's than OT's - should we be comparing $,  #'s or %?) and that translates to a lot of extra monies to defend/promote our profession.
Linda


Top 200 Contributor
Posts 39
Points 450
EJ is right--long ago, in the "olden days", we (AOTA) were threatened with anti-trust lawsuits for handling practice certification ("registration" early in my practice years) through AOTA. It was moved to NBCOT and then developing state laws began to use NBCOT certification only for the intial certification and no longer required NBCOT renewal of certification. So 50 state laws define what is "required" and AOTA has no say and there are no national requirements beyond initial certification. AOTA has not the power to "require" membership for practice.
Now if we reallly want to support AOTA membership, we might each work in our own states to have our state organizations change their bylaws to require membership--that would get a few more people involved.
I understand your frustration--I hated these changes as they gradually occurred over my 40 yr career. I have worked for AOTA throughout and can't imagine being so foolish as not to support the organization, but I don't seem to convince others who differ with me. I guess they have a different view--of a job, not a profession, maybe. We could require membership of our students (private school) because they weren't yet practicing, but it was awful hard to some drop membership in national and state associations after they began practice. I always felt like I had failed in convincing them of the importance, in spite of my passion (I'm a retired member now).
I don't understand the statements about ASHA or APTA--I don't see how they can require membership if they have state laws regulating practice. Maybe they were formed with the tight chapter concepts (chapters as subsections of the national) and so you must be a national member to join the state/regional chapter/subsection, but that is not our current structure.
Ruth

Ruth Zemke, PhD, OTR(ret.), FAOTA
1901 Mimosa Place
Fullerton, CA 92835
(714) 671-0364
rzemke@usc.edu

________________________________________
From: general [general@aotOTA.org] on behalf of Linda M. Hetue [bounce-lindamh@aota.org]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 7:01 PM
To: Zemke, Ruth
Subject: Re: [general] Membership and OT Issues

I had to go back and look at older posts -- Let me correct and re-phrase - Being a member of your state organization is mandatory in the APTA membership. However, a higher # of PT join their professional organization as compared to OT (41% PT / 36% OT) That 5% translates into over 8000 members for PT and 5000 members for OT ) - and there are more PT's than OT's - should we be comparing $, #'s or %?) and that translates to a lot of extra monies to defend/promote our profession.
Linda


On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ron Carson MHS, OT > wrote:

APTA membership is NOT a requirement to practice PT in any state that I know of.
From: Linda M. Hetue >
Sent: 2/12/2010 6:28:44 PM
Unless I'm mistanken - APTA requires membership. If you compare figures (look at OT Connection) you will notice the great difference in APTA membership and available funds for promoting PT. AOTA looks pitiful compared to APTA! If a majority (all) OT's were members, think of what a difference it would make to our profession.
Perhaps the issue is the separation of AOTA and NBCOT, preventing such a requirement? There were reasons at the time that never came to pass.
Linda

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:50 AM, ejbrown > wrote:

Anti-trust laws prevent AOTA - and as far as I am aware, all health care organizations - from requiring that graduates of educational programs become members of the associations. Membership was originally required of those who became certified by the American Occupational Therapy Certification Board (AOTCB, the forerunner of NBCOT). But since the certification board separated from the association and became an independent entity, membership has been voluntary. There is no way AOTA could enforce required membership. It has no power over right to practice. That power belongs to NBCOT and the state licensure boards.
From: Linda M. Hetue >
Sent: 8/21/2009 8:26:18 AM
Could we put this to a referendum vote - do we need a referendum vote - to make AOTA and local membership mandatory? I'm sure there would be a hue and cry but I think it's time. We've been nice forever - now let's be realistic too.
Linda

On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Michelle McKamy > wrote:

Hello Forum!!

MY VOTE: make AOTA membership Mandatory like ASHA and SLP's. Mandatory dues will instantly increase our budget and Money, like it or not, will solve many of the problems with our professions visibility, lobby needs, research, and activity. No OT can say they do not make enough money to contribute to the vitality of their own profession. With this money we could employ OTs or even committees to do public activities necessary to build our profession. It is our own fault that the general public doesnt know what we do. Maybe if OTs were forced to pay dues they would be inclined to be more involved...It's the principal TimeShares were based off of. TOTA in Dallas is currently rebuilding our local organization and we parallel the statistics quoted in the
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 56
Points 420
ASHA, Has membership mandates.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 67
Points 1,115

I also thought that APTA required membership.   Also, I believe the state associations are part of the national organizations and that's how membership fees are calculated.

 

Michelle



-----

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 69
Points 1,030

I did notice that many O.T. organizations  MASPOT (Michigan Association of School Physical and Occupational Therapists) , NBCOT, AOTA, Mi-OTA , and having to pay the state of MI also,        AOTA  not only is by far the most expensive, this higher amount only covers one year.

I believe if the costs of membership (especially in this economy and how it is affecting MI)  were put in line with the costs of the other associations, AOTA would get and keep more membership.  

Also, the growing number of free on line sites, like otexchange, are meeting the practical needs of many of the therapists (questions) as well.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 2 of 3 (37 items) < Previous 1 2 3 Next > | RSS