The following are my personal thoughts and not posted on behalf of the Board of Directors.
I have been fairly active in politics at multiple levels for many years. I get interested in elections for City Council, Mayor, state offices, national offices and national elections.
One of my favorite stories to tell is about a fund raising event I attended in Houston for Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin. It was held at a friend’s home and there were just about 100 of us so it was an interactive event with then candidate Baldwin.
When she gave her remarks to the crowd, she discussed “having a seat at the table” and remarked, “If you do not have a seat at the table talking WITH them, they are talking ABOUT you.”
One of the attendees politely interrupted candidate Baldwin and shared, “In Texas we say that if you do not have a seat the table you are on the menu!”
Recently the Board of Directors issued a position statement on moving to a single point of entry at the doctoral level for the occupational therapist and called for a profession wide dialogue.
As a member of the Board, and a long-standing member of AOTA I expected that this would give rise to passionate expression of opinion and that there would be divergent thinking about this potential change.
Dialogue has started here on OTConnections and that is great. Participation has been limited as if often the case and has hardly been profession wide. My guess is that fewer than 60 persons have posted and perhaps less than 2 or 3 times that are reading the posts. As expected, there is frequent participation from a few of us and many have posted just once.
My concern is that in several discussion venues I have heard messages that in one way or another devalue the opinion and perspectives of others because of their professional roles. A wonderful thing about the discussions here on OTConnections is that I am hearing the voices of persons I have never seen post before. That is wonderful even if they disagree with me. What concerns me most are suggestions that one perspective is more valid or valuable than another.
We MUST hear from direct care clinicians and those involved in treating clients everyday whether those clients are individuals, families, organizations, communities or populations. It is critical that those voices are heard. However, here are other voices who must also be heard and who also have valid and critical information to bring to the dialogue:
I hope as we continue over the next year or more that our dialogue truly becomes profession wide, that many questions are asked, that many points of view are heard, that much information and data are collected and analyzed……….
Most importantly, I hope that each and every one of us welcome each and all of our colleagues to a seat at the table……….so that they feel that they in the discussion and not that they are on the menu.
My two cents is- I think the voices are all over social media in terms of consumers goes. They can be on Facebook groups and fan pages. They can be on Twitter chats. The thing for us as a profession is to decipher which of these are pressing issues and which of them are not as such.