March 2010 - Posts

What Healthcare Reform Means to Occupational Therapy

Healthcare Reform

I want to share with you my thoughts on the historic health care reform legislation recently signed into law by the President, and update you on the impact of this measure on occupational therapy and those who can benefit from our services.  AOTA, with your help, has achieved significant victories for the profession in this legislation. We should be proud of what we all have accomplished through your advocacy efforts with phone calls, letters, participation in lobbying during our Capitol Hill Days, and the work of our leaders and staff. 

 

Whether you welcome or have concerns about the new law, AOTA worked hard to protect the profession as the legislation was being considered by Congress—and we succeeded.  We now have new opportunities before us because we have done the hard work and laid the groundwork.

 

Beginning with discussions in the AOTA Representative Assembly last year, through five major Capitol Hill lobbying days throughout the year, through waves of grassroots advocacy by AOTA members, our collective efforts paid dividends with several legislative victories included in the final version of reform.  These victories include:

 

·         A one-year extension for the Medicare therapy cap exceptions process, even as other Medicare provisions were not included in the final bill.  While it may seem as though Congress understands the policy error of the cap, it is still an uphill battle to maintain the commitment and to find the money to fund the therapy cap exceptions process.  Recall that AOTA also worked to assure that an interim extension of the exceptions process was passed to cover the first three months of this year while the health care debate continued.

 

·         The specific inclusion of “rehabilitation and habilitation” services in the essential health benefits package that will be offered and required to be obtained individuals. This is a significant gain over current insurance language that usually denies habilitation to children with disabilities. No specific professional services were identified at all in the bill, but this language assures recognition of occupational therapy and other important services that will now be available to all, including the eventual 32 million newly insured that will receive coverage under the new law. This provision was originally included in the House bill but it took work and aggressive lobbying by AOTA to gain inclusion in the Senate bill and thus in the final proposed package.

 

·         The specific inclusion of occupational therapists in the definitions of health care workforce and health care professionals in the “Innovations in the Health Care Workforce” section of the legislation, making them eligible for state workforce grants, for slots on the national commission on workforce established in the bill and other programs.  The original bill language did not include OT, but AOTA lobbying assured its addition.

 

Some items not in the bill are also victories for occupational therapy.  AOTA was successful in addressing two specific amendments offered during the process. The first would have allowed physical therapists direct access to patients in rural areas without a physician’s prescription. AOTA worked with members of the Senate Finance committee to insure that occupational therapists would be included in the amendment if it advanced and worked with the Senator offering the amendment to include occupational therapists or revise the amendment.  Ultimately this amendment was changed to authorize a study of the issue that can encompass both physical and occupational therapy.

 

The second was an amendment promoted by the orthotists and prosthetists that would have significantly restrained the OT scope of practice and Medicare reimbursement, as well as eliminated competition among credentialing bodies.  AOTA successfully worked with members of the Senate Finance Committee in opposing the amendment, which ultimately was never brought forward for consideration.

 

While the future is always unpredictable, I am certain about one thing:  no matter what changes come, occupational therapy will thrive.  I believe our Centennial Vision is giving us our own goals, regardless of the health care system, that we are pursuing.  I also believe that our power to make change that supports our Vision has made this new law favorable in many ways to occupational therapy.  I want to salute each and every member of AOTA who has expressed their views to Congress.  The current dialogue on OT Connections about health care is just what I envisioned for that network:  creating a community in which we could all participate, share, think and then act.

 

This law will not go into effect all at once.  Many decisions will be made about implementation and AOTA, with your continued support, will be working to assure those decisions serve the interests of occupational therapy and our clients. Your voice and your views will continue to spur AOTA’s advocacy. There will be change, but I know as a profession we can adapt and grow.  We always have.  Whether through Medicare cuts, licensure battles, or tough financial times, occupational therapy has been and I believe will continue to be on a growth trajectory.  We will move forward with change that we participate in and influence toward our Centennial Vision, modifying our environment, considering what our capabilities are, and then pursuing active engagement to Live Life To Its Fullest through our profession.

 

Keep watch on the AOTA website for updates and opportunities for you to work with the coming change to make occupational therapy a powerful, widely recognized, science-driven, and evidence-based profession with a globally connected and diverse workforce meeting society’s occupational needs.

 

Let’s move toward it together.

 

 

Penny Moyers Cleveland

 

 

AOTA will continue to work hard on implementation that is positive for the profession. Your voice and your views will continue to spur AOTA’s advocacy.

 

Posted by Penelope Moyers with no comments
Filed under:

AOTA Governance and newspapers, radio, television, and now the web!

Hi Everyone,

I want to share my thoughts about the Membership Participation Ad Hoc Proposal in relation to changing from proportional representation to an approach where members represent themselves. Let’s consider how professional associations are strategically applying social networking media to recruit members, organize locally, provide information, and give an ongoing forum to discuss and take action. The juxtaposition of a networked, open-sourced method of working with members has profound implications and raises significant questions for our current AOTA governance structures. Our members now are in an environment where they can communicate directly with the AOTA President, AOTA Board of Directors, as well as all the other leadership who make themselves available on OT Connections and Facebook, etc. This availability of leaders to members will become a member expectation and will challenge the notion of having to go through a representative to get to the leadership.

We are but a microcosm of the way in which communication technologies have had such a profound influence on government, business, education, healthcare, and our personal lives. Think about this evolution in using novel technologies: Thomas Jefferson used the power of newspapers , F.D.R. used radio, J.F.K. understood television, and presidential candidate Howard Dean first used the Web for raising money. President Barack Obama used social media to create a sense of connection and engagement that allowed people to self-organize to do the work of the campaign.

This AOTA reorganization proposal is forward thinking as it brings forth many possibilities, which are needed as we face the intensive regulatory work ahead after passage of healthcare reform. We need to engage people in discussion quickly, focus decision making on what makes a difference in our practice, quickly assemble teams to work on the supporting evidence, and mobilize occupational therapy practitioners to make sure they are heard at every table where important healthcare delivery decisions are made. There is tremendous power in opening membership access to the AOTA governance structure. It is a brilliant way to harness our incredible clout in enacting social change in terms of what we can bring about that is of value to the public. Does our current governance structure fit this requirement?

Penny Moyers Cleveland AOTA President

 

Posted by Penelope Moyers with 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

The Wherewithal to Change

 Hi all,

I am writing to clearly express my reasons for believing in the recommendations of the Membership Participation Ad Hoc Committee's proposal for reorganization of our governance structure.

If you do not think we need to change our AOTA governance structure, then why have greater than 70% of occupational therapy practitioners and students chosen not to be members of the organization even with the advent of aggressive marketing, extensive interviews and surveys of nonmembers, reshaping member benefits, and emphasis upon professionalism in entry-level education? Who will be the life-time members of the future after baby boomers retire as the average length of continuous membership has shrunk to 4 years? How many total members will we need to advance the profession based on a metric of each individual being a member for 4 years or less? Why is it that we have more members over 60 than we do under 30? What is it about the membership value proposition that needs changing? What competition do we face in trying to obtain the interest and loyalty of new members while at the same time increasing retention of existing members? We must remember that we cannot mandate membership like we did in the past when AOTA was also the certifying body for the profession.

As I near the end of my Presidency, what are the lessons I have learned, particularly when you examine our membership issues in conjunction with all that has occurred in the world surrounding us, such as a global economic recession? Here is what I have learned and want to pass on to all our leaders and members. Even in the best of times, it is a given that there are limits to human and financial resources. As a steward of membership investment in our Association, it is my duty in conjunction with members of the Board of Directors to make strategic decisions about how we will use our resources for the greatest impact in achieving our Centennial Vision goals and objectives. The proposal from the Membership Participation Ad Hoc Committee is about increasing the membership value proposition in that we know members feel valued when they are involved to their level of satisfaction (not too much and not too little). They want to be asked to participate in important ways. While our membership percentage to nonmembers may be higher than other organizations, we are a small profession in total. Therefore, this percentage does not translate into the human and financial capital needed to accomplish our important work for the profession and the clients we serve. If you examine the member survey informing the Membership Participation Ad Hoc Committee, 80% were satisfied with their level of involvement. This means that 20% are not, which is decidedly more than the percentage of those currently involved (6%). Why would we not go after this 20% who want more involvement? Why would we not advocate change when our current structure limits who can be involved?

The reorganization conceptual proposal is about focusing the work of our volunteers on the issues and challenges in the external environment. For instance, what current organizational structures are responsible for tackling ways that efficiently create impact in successfully resolving tough reimbursement issues, scope of practice challenges, healthcare policy questions, gathering evidence, creating research capacity, pushing for educational excellence, facilitating growth in practice, and supporting and developing emerging practice areas? These are tough questions because the key word is impact. For instance, perhaps the greatest impact in terms of creating diversity in the profession is for educational groups within the organization to marshal their efforts in advocating for federal support of faculty development, of student loan programs, and of student loan forgiveness programs.  I cannot identify any standing committee in the volunteer sector of the organization, despite its many bodies, that would see these activities as a core responsibility.

Further, the kinds of impacts we now need to have must occur without delay. In the past, we had time to allow impact to build slowly over many years.  We could experiment with a variety of Association strategies until we got it right. Membership energy must be mobilized quickly. Specialized ad hoc committees need to be assembled with immediacy and given priority, such as, for example, to address the coming storm over Medicaid. Can we free up the human and financial capital to launch aggressive advocacy in every state in which this is occurring? Today’s issues demand expediency and laser-focus. And the process of recruiting the best talent to produce the most powerful results must be accelerated.  We do not have the luxury to simultaneously operate complicated structures with diffuse agendas while we also try to focus on the Centennial Vision priorities. It is time to redirect resources if we are to truly go for impact.

Penny Moyers Cleveland

AOTA President

Addendum to President's Report to the RA

  Hi all,

I just wanted to let you know that I have submitted an addendum to my report to the RA in regards to the reorganization proposal. This addendum came about because of two very informative calls with the members of the Ethics Commission. Based on their input, I believed it was important to make sure their ideas were included. Some of their ideas are not in this addendum, particularly in relation to how the adjudication process should be handled. I am working on those ideas and will make them available to the membership and the RA Task Group as soon as they are fully formulated. I want to thank Dr. Kitty Reed for facilitating the discussion about ethics and how our organization can develop an integrated ethics model. The conversation was exciting to hear the possibilities. I firmly believe that ethics is everyone's business and that the Organization should be strongly involved in the prevention of ethical problems through a concerted education approach.

Penny Moyers Cleveland

AOTA President

Addendum to President’s Report – Participation Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations

Further Development Relative to Ethics Commission

February 26, 2010

In late February, the Participation Ad Hoc Committee, along with President Moyers Cleveland, engaged in a phone discussion with the Ethics Commission (EC) about the recommendations that are specific to the EC and the ethics function. As a result of that discussion the committee would like to add a few more points to the description of how the EC needs to evolve in the transition process.

 

􀂾 Evolution from our current ethics approach towards an integrated ethics approach across the association. AOTA would explore the development of an integrated ethics program that addresses ethical issues proactively as well as reactively. Organizational as well as clinical ethics would be addressed, with participation of practitioners and educators.

􀂾 An increased focus on educating members Advisory Opinions, articles, book chapters, academic education materials and continuing education offerings.

􀂾 The Volunteer Leadership Development Committee (VLDC) would have an ethics education function as part of all leadership training in order to promote ethical leadership throughout the organization.

􀂾 The Coordinated Online Opportunities for Leadership (COOL) database would ask questions specific to ethics interests and expertise and establish a pool of ethics experts to use on a variety of ad hoc groups and in development of educational materials for members. As stated in Kitty Reed’s summary of the February phone call, “other groups within the AOTA could participate in providing information and training about ethics. For example, educators could assist in preparing an advisory opinion on emerging issues with technology in the universities or colleges that have occupational therapy ducational programs.”

These next items are other considerations that could be a part of the transition process:

􀂾 We would encourage the development of a Community of Practice (CoP) related to ethical issues open to all members.

􀂾 As previously stated the seated EC chairperson would be a member of the inaugural Council to provide guidance and assistance in the transition process. Having the seated EC chairperson on the Council makes it possible for the Council to consider immediately appointing an ad hoc committee to ensure appropriate plans be made relative to development of an integrated ethics approach for AOTA.

􀂾 Issues remain related to the continued need for our current adjudication process; more information related to specific recommendations will be presented for discussion at the Task Group level.

Posted by Penelope Moyers with 2 comment(s)
Filed under:

What is the process the AOTA Reorganization Proposal must go through?

Hi all,

I hope you have read the proposal in the President's report to the RA for reorganization and that you have followed the lively discussion under forums, Ad Hoc Participation. I want to make sure everyone understands the process this proposal must go through before it ever is enacted. There are many steps and anything can change along the way. Some of the steps we have completed. (* indicate what we have completed; **indicates what is currently in process):

1. Board is concerned that members want more participation and that the governance structure might need revision to accommodate more participation.* 2009

2. Board votes to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee and makes recommendations for appointments. * 2009

3. Consultants are vetted, selected, and one firm hired. * 2009

4. President appoints Ad Hoc group and consultant begins to collect data. * 2009

5. Ad Hoc group meets several times and submits proposal to Board of Directors.* 2009

6. Ad Hoc co-chair presents proposal to Board and Board votes to send proposal to RA and charges Ad Hoc group to develop and implement a member communication plan. * 2009

7. Communication plan is implemented via phone calls to leadership groups, dialogue on OT Connections, President Blog, materials on web-site, OT Practice articles ** 2009-2010

8. RA Task Group Considers and either forwards as is, amends, or recommends defeat to RA. RA Task group discussion begins on-line and then continues on site in Orlando. 2010

9. If the RA task group brings to floor of the entire RA, motion is debated, passed, amended, or defeated. 2010

10. If the motion passes as it is written now, transition begins to outline the change process in more detail and to write By-laws ammendment. By-laws ammendment goes for review by BPPC and the Board. The Board refers the Bylaws motion to the RA. 2010-2011

11. RA either passes, amends, or defeats Bylaws motion to take to membership. 2011

12. Membership either passes or defeats Bylaws motion. 2011

13. If Bylaws motion passes, the change is implemented. 2011-2012

Penny Moyers Cleveland

AOTA President

Posted by Penelope Moyers with no comments
Filed under: